Intel licensed a set of patents from South Korean firm LG, then used some of the licensed patents to create parts of the chipset technology it sold to Taiwanese computer makers like Quanta. LG then sued the computer makers in a US court, claiming that the patent license to Intel specifically did not extend to combining Intel parts with non-Intel parts, and that the computer makers in question each needed to obtain licenses from LG. The Supreme Court has now agreed to take up the issue, which could help to answer the question of how many times a patent holder can cash in as products move through the supply chain.
This blog is for anyone who is interested in issues relating to copyrights, patents, and other aspects frequently referred to as intellectual property. For people in the Cambridge and Boston area, we meet once a month over dinner for conversation. If you'd like to submit a link to something interesting for the blog, please email cambridge at copynight dot org.
Monday, October 08, 2007
The Supreme Court will hear another case having patent implications.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete